Reliable detection of genetic alterations in cyst fluid DNA for the diagnosis of brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Liquid biopsy of cyst fluid in brain tumors has not been extensively studied to date. The present study was performed to see whether diagnostic genetic alterations found in brain tumor tissue DNA could also be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of cyst fluid in cystic brain tumors. METHODS: Cyst fluid was obtained from 22 patients undergoing surgery for a cystic brain tumor with confirmed genetic alterations in tumor DNA. Pathological diagnoses based on WHO 2021 classification and diagnostic alterations in the tumor DNA, such as IDH1 R132H and TERT promoter mutation for oligodendrogliomas, were detected by Sanger sequencing. The same alterations were analyzed by both droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and Sanger sequencing in cyst fluid cfDNA. Additionally, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assays were performed to assess 1p/19q status, presence of CDKN2A loss, PTEN loss and EGFR amplification, to assess whether differentiating between astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas and grading is possible from cyst fluid cfDNA. RESULTS: Twenty-five genetic alterations were found in 22 tumor samples. All (100%) alterations were detected in cyst fluid cfDNA by ddPCR. Twenty of the 25 (80%) alterations were also detected by Sanger sequencing of cyst fluid cfDNA. Variant allele frequency (VAF) in cyst fluid cfDNA was comparable to that of tumor DNA (R = 0.62, Pearson's correlation). MLPA was feasible in 11 out of 17 (65%) diffuse gliomas, with close correlation of results between tumor DNA and cyst fluid cfDNA. CONCLUSION: Cell-free DNA obtained from cyst fluid in cystic brain tumors is a reliable alternative to tumor DNA when diagnosing brain tumors.

Profiling of circulating glial cells for accurate blood-based diagnosis of glial malignancies.

Here, we describe a blood test for the detection of glial malignancies (GLI-M) based on the identification of circulating glial cells (CGCs). The test is highly specific for GLI-M and can detect multiple grades (II-IV) and subtypes including gliomas, astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, oligoastrocytomas and glioblastomas, irrespective of gender and age. Analytical validation of the test was performed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Real-world performance characteristics of the test were evaluated in four clinical (observational) studies. The test has high analytical sensitivity (95%), specificity (100%) and precision (coefficient of variation [CV] = 13.7% for repeatability and CV = 23.5% for within laboratory precision, both at the detection threshold) and is not prone to interference from common drugs and serum factors. The ability of the test to detect and differentiate GLI-M from non-malignant brain tumours (NBT), brain metastases from primary epithelial malignancies (EPI-M) and healthy individual donors (HD) was evaluated in four clinical cohorts. Across these clinical studies, the test showed 99.35% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.44%-99.98%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 99.37%-100%). The performance characteristics of this test support its clinical utility for diagnostic triaging of individuals presenting with intracranial space-occupying lesions (ICSOL).

[Classification and Diagnosis of Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas].

The Central Nervous System Tumours: WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed.(WHO CNS5)incorporates molecular pathogenesis with histopathology to classify brain tumors into more biologically and narrowly defined entities. According to this approach, adult-type diffuse gliomas are classified into three tumor types: astrocytoma, IDH-mutant; oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted; and glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma are clearly defined as IDH-mutant tumors, and glioblastoma as an IDH-wildtype tumor. WHO CNS5 provides clear diagnostic criteria framed as "essential and desirable diagnostic criteria," including histopathological and molecular features. In this article, we summarized the diagnostic and grading criteria of adult-type diffuse gliomas, which include histopathological and molecular features. Further, we presented a clinical diagnostic workflow based on the immunohistopathological studies, molecular tests and their surrogate assays, and histopathological features to establish the diagnosis of adult-type diffuse gliomas. We also discussed the limitations of the clinical diagnostic workflow; for instance, some tumors may not fit within this classification provided by this diagnostic flow. Despite these limitations, we are required to utilize the diagnostic criteria and determine optimal treatment in the clinical setting.

Diagnostic algorithm for pathological evaluation of gliomas in a resource-constrained setting.

Introduction: Gliomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors recommends integrated histo-molecular diagnosis of gliomas. However, molecular testing is not available in even most of the advanced centers of our country, and histopathology aided with immunohistochemistry (IHC) is still widely used for diagnosis. Immunohistochemical markers such as iso-citrate dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) and Alpha Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-linked (ATRX) can be reliably used for the correct diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gliomas. Aim: We aimed to develop a diagnostic algorithm by integrating morphology, IDH1, and ATRX status of gliomas seen in our institute for 1 year. Settings and Design: Analytical cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: This study included 60 histopathologically confirmed cases of astrocytic (n = 51) and oligodendroglial tumors (n = 9). Clinical, radiological, and histopathological features were noted and tumor grades assigned according to the WHO recommendations. IDH1 and ATRX mutation status was evaluated using IHC. The tumors were divided into three molecular groups on the basis of their IDH1 and ATRX mutation status: (1) Group 1: IDH1 negative and ATRX positive, (2) Group 2: IDH1 positive and ATRX positive, (3) Group 3: IDH1 positive and ATRX negative. Results: The mean age of presentation was 45.0 ± 15.8 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Seizures, headache, and hemiparesis were the most common modes of presentation. The tumor subtypes studied were glioblastoma (n = 32), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 7), diffuse astrocytoma (n = 6), oligodendroglioma (n = 6), pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 6), and anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n = 3). IDH1 mutation was present in 26 cases including anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 7), diffuse astrocytoma (n = 6), oligodendroglioma (n = 5), secondary glioblastoma (n = 5), and anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n = 3). ATRX mutation, i. e., loss of ATRX was observed in 17 cases including diffuse astrocytoma (n = 5), anaplastic astocytoma (n = 5), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n = 3), oligodendroglioma (n = 3), and secondary glioblastoma (n = 1). All six cases of pilocytic astrocytoma were negative for IDH1 and ATRX mutation. There were 34 patients in Group 1 (IDH1- and ATRX +), nine cases in Group 2 (IDH1 + and ATRX +), and 17 patients in Group 3 (IDH1 + and ATRX-). Conclusion: Diagnosis of gliomas should be based on a detailed clinicoradiological and histopathological assessment, followed by genotypic characterization. Evaluation for IDH1and ATRX status has both diagnostic and prognostic value as it helps in differentiating gliomas from reactive gliosis, primary glioblastoma from secondary glioblastoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma (WHO grade I) from diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II). Tumors with IDH1 mutations have a better outcome than those with wild-type IDH. IHC can serve as a useful surrogate to conventional molecular tests in resource-constrained settings. By devising an algorithm based on morphological and IHC features, we were able to stratify gliomas into three prognostic subgroups.

Practice of IDH1, ATRX, and P53 Immunohistochemistry in Integrated Diagnosis of Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Single Center Study.

Diffuse gliomas exhibit different molecular and genetic profiles with a wide range of heterogeneity and prognosis. Recently, molecular parameters including ATRX, P53, and IDH mutation status or absence or presence of 1p/19q co-deletion have become a crucial part of the diagnosis of diffuse glioma. In the present study, we tried to analyze the routine practice of the above-mentioned molecular markers focusing on the IHC method in cases of adult diffuse gliomas to evaluate their utility in the integrated diagnosis of adult diffuse gliomas. In total, 134 cases of adult diffuse glioma were evaluated. Using the IHC method, 33,12, and 12 cases of IDH mutant Astrocytoma grade 2, 3, 4, and 45 cases of gliobalstoma, IDH wild type, were molecularly diagnosed. By adding the FISH study for 1p/19q co-deletion, 9 and 8 cases of oligodendroglioma grade 2 and 3 also were included. Two IDH mutant cases were negative for IDH1 in IHC but revealed a positive mutation in further molecular testing. Finally, we were not able to incorporate a complete integrated diagnosis in 16/134(11.94%) of cases. The main molecularly unclassified group was histologically high-grade diffuse glial tumors in patients less than 55 years old and negative IDH1 immunostaining. P53 was positive in 23/33 grade 2, 4/12 grade 3, and 7/12 grade 4 astrocytomas, respectively. Four out of 45 glioblastomas showed positive immunostain, and all oligodendrogliomas were negative. In conclusion, a panel of IHC markers for IDH1 R132H, P53, and ATRX significantly improves the molecular classification of adult diffuse gliomas in daily practice and can be used as a tool to select limited cases for co-deletion testing in the low resources area.

Update on quality assurance in neuropathology: Summary of the round robin trials on TERT promoter mutation, H3-3A mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and KIAA1549::BRAF fusion testing in Germany in 2020 and 2021.

We previously reported on the first neuropathological round robin trials operated together with Quality in Pathology (QuIP) GmbH in 2018 and 2019 in Germany, i.e., the trials on IDH mutational testing and MGMT promoter methylation analysis [1]. For 2020 and 2021, the spectrum of round robin trials has been expanded to cover the most commonly used assays in neuropathological institutions. In addition to IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation testing, there is a long tradition for 1p/19q codeletion testing relevant in the context of the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma. With the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the central nervous system tumors, additional molecular markers came into focus: TERT promoter mutation is often assessed as a molecular diagnostic criterion for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Moreover, several molecular diagnostic markers have been introduced for pediatric brain tumors. Here, trials on KIAA1549::BRAF fusions (common in pilocytic astrocytomas) and H3-3A mutations (in diffuse midline gliomas, H3-K27-altered and diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3-G34-mutant) were most desired by the neuropathological community. In this update, we report on these novel round robin trials. In summary, success rates in all four trials ranged from 75 to 96%, arguing for an overall high quality level in the field of molecular neuropathological diagnostics.

Oligodendroglioma metastasizing to cervical lymph node: Rare entity diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Extra neural metastasis of central nervous system oligodendroglioma is very rare. Oligodendroglioma is the seventh most frequently occurring neoplasm of central nervous system (CNS) with metastasis outside the CNS. According to literature, presence of metastasis in CNS was most frequently detected in patients of glioblastoma (41.4%), medulloblastoma (26.7%), ependymomas (16.4%), astrocytoma (10.3%) and oligodendroglioma (5.27%). A 38-year-old male patient presented with loss of vision and swelling on left side of neck since last 1 week measuring 3 x 2 cm. He was operated for brain tumor 7 years back, which was diagnosed as oligodendroglioma. Ultrasound sonography revealed multiple hypoechoic lymph nodes in bilateral cervical region largest measuring 4.5 x 1.9 cm in left submandibular region. FNA of left submandibular lymph node was done, which revealed deposits of poorly differentiated malignancy. Cell block was prepared for carrying out ancillary studies which showed positivity for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 and negativity for cytokeratin (CK), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), LCA and progesterone receptor (PR). Based on previous history of oligodendroglioma, cytological and immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings a diagnosis of metastatic oligodendroglioma was made. Metastasis of oligodendroglioma to cervical lymph node should also be considered as one of the differential diagnoses. Diagnosing metastatic CNS tumor is extremely challenging for pathologists. It is essential to have the clinical information of a previous CNS tumor, including the histologic type and immunophenotype. Besides common malignancies of cervical lymph node, we should also think of CNS metastasis so that patient management will be early and proper.

Evaluation of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 panel for the detection of 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumours.

AIMS: Accurate assessment of 1p/19q codeletion status in diffuse gliomas is of paramount importance for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. While targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely implemented for glioma molecular profiling, its role in detecting structural chromosomal variants is less well established, requiring supplementary informatic tools for robust detection. Herein, we evaluated a commercially available amplicon-based targeted NGS panel (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3) for the detection of 1p/19q losses in glioma tissues using an Ion Torrent platform and the standard built-in NGS data analysis pipeline solely. METHODS: Using as little as 20 ng of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, we analysed 25 previously characterised gliomas for multi-locus copy number losses (CNLs) on 1p and 19q, including 11 oligodendrogliomas (ODG) and 14 non-oligodendroglial (non-ODG) controls. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) was used as a reference standard. RESULTS: The software confidently detected combined contiguous 1p/19q CNLs in 11/11 ODGs (100% sensitivity), using a copy number cut-off of ≤1.5 and a minimum of 10 amplicons covering the regions. Only partial non-specific losses were identified in non-ODGs (100% specificity). Copy number averages of ODG and non-ODG groups were significantly different (p<0.001). NGS was concordant with FISH and was superior to it in distinguishing partial from contiguous losses indicative of whole-arm chromosomal deletion. CONCLUSIONS: This commercial NGS panel, along with the standard Ion Torrent algorithm, accurately detected 1p/19q losses in ODG samples, obviating the need for specialised custom-made informatic analyses. This can easily be incorporated into routine glioma workflow as an alternative to FISH.

Symptomatic Spinal Seeding Metastasis of a Low-grade Oligodendroglioma.

Extracranial metastases from primary brain tumours are mostly caused by high-grade tumours. Metastases from low-grade intracranial tumours are much rare and usually asymptomatic. We present a case of a symptomatic spinal cord compression with intradural extramedullary and diffuse leptomeningeal infiltration observed approximately 51 months after the first diagnosis of a 52-year male patient with WHO Grade 2 oligodendroglioma with temporoparietal localisation. This patient, who had the complaint of weakness in the lower extremity, was operated on due to a thoracic intradural extramedullary mass. The result of the pathological examination came out as WHO Grade 2 oligodendroglioma, and radiotherapy was planned for this seeding metastasis. The patient who experienced refractory seizures died before his radiotherapy treatment was completed. It should be kept in mind that spinal metastases may also be seen in low-grade intracranial tumours without malignant transformation as in the present case. Key Words: Spinal seeding, Spinal metastases, Low-grade oligodendroglioma.

Inter-pathologist agreement on diagnosis, classification and grading of canine glioma.

Histopathological evaluation of tumours is a subjective process, but studies of inter-pathologist agreement are uncommon in veterinary medicine. The Comparative Brain Tumour Consortium (CBTC) recently published diagnostic criteria for canine gliomas. Our objective was to assess the degree of inter-pathologist agreement on intracranial canine gliomas, utilising the CBTC diagnostic criteria in a cohort of eighty-five samples from dogs with an archival diagnosis of intracranial glioma. Five pathologists independently reviewed H&E and immunohistochemistry sections and provided a diagnosis and grade. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics were calculated to measure inter-pathologist agreement between pairs and amongst the entire group. A consensus diagnosis of glioma subtype and grade was achieved for 71/85 (84%) cases. For these cases, percentage agreement on combined diagnosis (subtype and grade), subtype only and grade only were 66%, 80% and 82%, respectively. Kappa statistics for the same were 0.466, 0.542 and 0.516, respectively. Kappa statistics for oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma and undefined glioma were 0.585, 0.566 and 0.280 and were 0.516 for both low-grade and high-grade tumours. Kappa statistics amongst pairs of pathologists for combined diagnosis varied from 0.352 to 0.839. 8 % of archival oligodendrogliomas and 61% of archival astrocytomas were reclassified as another entity after review. Inter-pathologist agreement utilising CBTC guidelines for canine glioma was moderate overall but varied from fair to almost perfect between pairs of pathologists. Agreement was similar for oligodendrogliomas and astrocytomas but lower for undefined gliomas. These results are similar to pathologist agreement in human glioma studies and with other tumour entities in veterinary medicine.

HIP1R and vimentin immunohistochemistry predict 1p/19q status in IDH-mutant glioma.

BACKGROUND: IDH-mutant gliomas are separate based on the codeletion of the chromosomal arms 1p and 19q into oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted and astrocytomas IDH-mutant. While nuclear loss of ATRX expression excludes 1p/19q codeletion, its limited sensitivity prohibits to conclude on 1p/19q status in tumors with retained nuclear ATRX expression. METHODS: Employing mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis in a discovery series containing 35 fresh frozen and 72 formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tumors with established IDH and 1p/19q status, potential biomarkers were discovered. Subsequent validation immunohistochemistry was conducted on two independent series (together 77 oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted and 92 astrocytomas IDH-mutant). RESULTS: We detected highly specific protein patterns distinguishing oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma. In these patterns, high HIP1R and low vimentin levels were observed in oligodendroglioma while low HIP1R and high vimentin levels occurred in astrocytoma. Immunohistochemistry for HIP1R and vimentin expression in 35 cases from the FFPE discovery series confirmed these findings. Blinded evaluation of the validation cohorts predicted the 1p/19q status with a positive and negative predictive value as well as an accuracy of 100% in the first cohort and with a positive predictive value of 83%; negative predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 92% in the second cohort. Nuclear ATRX loss as marker for astrocytoma increased the sensitivity to 96% and the specificity to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that immunohistochemistry for HIP1R, vimentin, and ATRX predict 1p/19q status with 100% specificity and 95% sensitivity and therefore, constitutes a simple and inexpensive approach to the classification of IDH-mutant glioma.

A review of adult-type diffuse gliomas in the WHO CNS5 classification with special reference to Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted.

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5) features several changes in the classification, diagnostic criteria, nomenclature, and grading of diffuse gliomas. Adult-type diffuse gliomas are genetically defined and include astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted, and glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. This review briefly discusses two tumor types: astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, and oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted, with emphasis on relevant changes in their classification and defining molecular genetic alterations. A simplified approach to the diagnosis of these tumors is provided.

Molecular landscape of IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma grade 2 indicate tumor purity as an underlying genomic factor.

BACKGROUND: IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma have an indolent natural history and are recognized as distinct entities of neoplasms. There is little knowledge on the molecular differences between IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma grade 2. Therefore, we investigated the multiomics and clinical data regarding these two types of tumors. METHOD: In silico analyses were performed around mRNA, somatic mutations, copy number alternations (CNAs), DNA methylation, microRNA (miRNA), epigenetics, immune microenvironment characterization and clinical features of the two types of gliomas. A diagnostic model incorporating tumor purity was further established using machine learning algorithms, and the predictive value was evaluated by receiver operative characteristic curves. RESULTS: Both types of gliomas shared chromosomal instability, and astrocytomas exhibited increased total CNAs compared to oligodendrogliomas. Oligodendrogliomas displayed distinct chromosome 4 (chr 4) loss, and subtyping of chr 7 gain/chr 4 loss (+ 7/- 4) presented the worst survival (P = 0.004) and progression-free interval (PFI) (P < 0.001). In DNA damage signatures, oligodendroglioma had a higher subclonal genome fraction (P < 0.001) and tumor purity (P = 0.001), and astrocytoma had a higher aneuploidy score (P < 0.001). Furthermore, astrocytomas exhibited inflamed immune cell infiltration, activated T cells and a potential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while oligodendrogliomas were more homogeneous with increased tumor purity and decreased aggression. The tumor purity-involved diagnostic model exhibited great accuracy in identifying astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. CONCLUSION: This study addresses the similarities and differences between IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma grade 2 and facilitates a deeper understanding of their molecular features, immune microenvironment, tumor purity and prognosis. The diagnostic tool developed using machine learning may offer support for clinical decisions.

A patient with two gliomas with independent oligodendroglioma and glioblastoma biology proved by DNA-methylation profiling: a case report and review of the literature.

Here, we report on a patient presenting with two histopathologically distinct gliomas. At the age of 42, the patient underwent initial resection of a right temporal oligodendroglioma IDH mutated 1p/19q co-deleted WHO Grade II followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. 15 months after initial diagnosis, the patient showed right hemispheric tumor progression and an additional new left frontal contrast enhancement in the subsequent imaging. A re-resection of the right-sided tumor and resection of the left frontal tumor were conducted. Neuropathological work-up showed recurrence of the right-sided oligodendroglioma with features of an anaplastic oligodendroglioma WHO Grade III, but a glioblastoma WHO grade IV for the left frontal lesion. In depth molecular profiling revealed two independent brain tumors with distinct molecular profiles of anaplastic oligodendroglioma IDH mutated 1p/19q co-deleted WHO Grade III and glioblastoma IDH wildtype WHO grade IV. This unique and rare case of a patient with two independent brain tumors revealed by in-depth molecular work-up and epigenomic profiling emphasizes the importance of integrated work-up of brain tumors including methylome profiling for advanced patient care.

Diagnostic accuracy of 1p/19q codeletion tests in oligodendroglioma: A comprehensive meta-analysis based on a Cochrane systematic review.

Codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, in conjunction with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 gene, is the molecular diagnostic criterion for oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. 1p/19q codeletion is a diagnostic marker and allows prognostication and prediction of the best drug response within IDH-mutant tumours. We performed a Cochrane review and simple economic analysis to establish the most sensitive, specific and cost-effective techniques for determining 1p/19q codeletion status. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) test methods were considered as reference standard. Most techniques (FISH, chromogenic in situ hybridisation [CISH], PCR, real-time PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification [MLPA], single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] array, comparative genomic hybridisation [CGH], array CGH, next-generation sequencing [NGS], mass spectrometry and NanoString) showed good sensitivity (few false negatives) for detection of 1p/19q codeletions in glioma, irrespective of whether FISH or PCR-based LOH was used as the reference standard. Both NGS and SNP array had a high specificity (fewer false positives) for 1p/19q codeletion when considered against FISH as the reference standard. Our findings suggest that G banding is not a suitable test for 1p/19q analysis. Within these limits, considering cost per diagnosis and using FISH as a reference, MLPA was marginally more cost-effective than other tests, although these economic analyses were limited by the range of available parameters, time horizon and data from multiple healthcare organisations.

Immunohistochemical expression of Olig2, CD99, and EMA to differentiate oligodendroglial-like neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: This study has assessed the diagnostic ability of oligodendrocyte-2 (Olig2), CD99, and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunohistochemical stains to diagnose oligodendroglial-like neoplasms as central neurocytoma, ependymoma, or oligodendroglioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel of Olig2, EMA, and CD99 was performed on 18 central neurocytomas, 46 ependymomas, and 28 oligodendrogliomas. A quantitative labelling index of stained tumor cells was assessed using a scoring system, and its diagnostic predictability was evaluated with multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Significant differences in IHC expression patterns were observed between all tumor groups (p < 0.001). The labeling indices of the histochemical expression of Olig2, EMA, and CD99 were related to diagnostic predictability. Olig2 was unlikely to differentiate ependymoma from central neurocytoma (p = 0.154), while EMA and CD99 were significant in diagnosing these two tumors (p < 0.05). Olig2 was a specific marker of oligodendroglioma, differentiating it from ependymoma and central neurocytoma (p 0.05), but CD99 significantly differentiated ependymoma from oligodendroglioma (p = 0.022). These labelling indices were used to re-assess the diagnostic accuracy, regardless of tumor location and histology, and yielded significantly different tumor diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The IHC panel of Olig2, EMA, and CD99 should be used to differentiate oligodendroglial-like neoplasms. Olig2 is a specific IHC marker to diagnose oligodendroglioma and differentiate it from ependymoma and central neurocytoma. Lack of Olig2 expression rules out oligodendroglioma and suggests the diagnosis of ependymoma rather than central neurocytoma if the EMA labelling index shows diffuse/partial expression. CD99 is considered a sensitive marker for ependymoma but not central neurocytoma.

Revisiting vimentin: a negative surrogate marker of molecularly defined oligodendroglioma in adult type diffuse glioma.

Vimentin is a marker of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and indicates poor prognosis in various cancers, but its role in diffuse gliomas remains unknown. We investigated the vimentin expression of diffuse gliomas according to the upcoming 2021 WHO classification, its variations due to mutational status, and its prognostic effects. We analyzed vimentin immunohistochemistry in 315 gliomas: a test set (n = 164) and a validation set (n = 151). RNA-seq and mutational information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 422) were also used for validation. Vimentin was diffusely positive in astrocytic tumors but negative in oligodendroglial tumors (ODGs) and its expression was significantly higher in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type tumors. High vimentin expression was correlated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.99), but it was dependent on the new WHO grade which reflects both histologic features and genetics (HR: 1.28). Using the significant difference in vimentin expression between ODGs and astrocytic tumors, the positive and negative predictive values of the vimentin-based diagnosis for ODGs were 93.5% and 97.8% in the validation set. Along with additional alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation, X-linked (ATRX) immunohistostaining, the values were 98.3% and 97.8%, respectively. Vimentin is a useful ancillary marker for identifying ODGs when combined with routine histochemistry markers.